Why did CCSU adopt a mandatory notebook policy?
In January 1998, through the Information Technology Project (ITP), Clayton College & State University became the third public university in the nation wherein all students and faculty were equipped with notebook computers. The University believed that having all students using notebook computers as a part of the learning process their education would be enhanced as well as position CCSU students in the job market ahead of those who did not have the same type of experience with computers.

Since that time, the program has developed into an unqualified success in its most important measure -- the improvement of the learning and teaching process at Clayton State. A survey of students and faculty taken in the fall of 2000 found that more than three-quarters of those polled said that ITP enhanced learning at Clayton State. Furthermore, ITP won national recognition, including a Pioneer Award from the Fourth Annual Conference on Ubiquitous Computing.

What were some of the problems with ITP?
Even with the program's success, there were clearly aspects of ITP that were not popular with its most important audience -- Clayton State students. The technology fee was $300 per semester. Students expressed that they would prefer to purchase their own notebook and pay a reduced technology fee. At graduation or for a semester that a student was not enrolled, the student had to return the notebook computer to the university. The students were also responsible for any physical damage that occurred to the computer while it was checked out to them. After more than three years of listening to student comments about how to improve ITP, Clayton State announced ITP Choice.

What was the reaction when CCSU announced that ITP was changing and what are the benefits of ITP Choice?
Clayton State maintained its commitment to technologically enhance learning and teaching through ubiquitous mobile computing on campus by continuing its requirement that all students have access to a notebook computer. However, under ITP Choice, students have the freedom of choice... in selecting a notebook computer and in selecting an Internet Service Provider (ISP). A reduced technology fee, $38, was also implemented. Students were overwhelmingly pleased with these changes.

Some of the other aspects of ITP Choice are as follows:

*Clayton State established faculty-approved minimum hardware/software requirements for notebooks. These are updated annually.

* Students are required to state that they have on demand access to a notebook that meets those requirements before registering for class.

* Students have a variety of options, including ownership of a new notebook, ownership of a used notebook, ownership of a refurbished notebook, using an already-owned notebook, or leasing, sharing or renting a notebook to meet the minimum requirements.

A list of preferred (but not required) vendors of notebooks is posted for student information on the ITP Choice notebook configuration web page. The HUB will continue to provide hardware and software service to Clayton State students and assists all students with software and hardware problems if their machines are under warranty and the HUB is certified to service those machines by the vendor.

Although the University no longer provides students with an ISP, Clayton State continues to provide an electronic post office e-mail address for each student, and student class mailing lists as was provided in ITP.

ITP Choice provides students with a second location of the HUB. This location, Student Software Support Services, provides students an area to come for individual assistance,installation of the Microsoft Campus Agreement Software and course specific software for student notebooks. Faculty do not recieve services on their notebooks from this location. However this location works closely with faculty to provide workshops and individual assistance so that the educational process is enhanced through the use of technology.

Clayton State hosts a Technology Fair for preferred notebook vendors annually during the summer semester -- wherein hardware alternatives will be clearly defined, positives and negatives of alternative machines explained, and specific product examples shown.

After a review of income and expenses associated with the technology fee, a committee composed of students, faculty and staff determined that an increase was necessary. The technology fee was increasd to $50 fall semester 2005.

What is your vision of the future for ubiquitous computing and Clayton State?
Please send your comments to The HUB